Britain and the Sea:
Desirable Scholarly Features
Given the requirement that the material be used for learning, we should
try to distinguish the project from the usual lightweight, flashy web offerings,
not by imitating any book format, but by including essential features for
scholarly communication, such as:
- commented bibliography to stiffen the academic basis of the project, and to
underline the point that the web is just a medium; that much important work is still
published on paper and will continue to be so; but that there is no reason why
a web-based presentation shouldn't parallel a book in seriousness and excede it
in flexibility;
- web publications in the bibliography with books/articles, but as a separate
section: the point above may be underlined by making sure that as many
bibliographical items as possible are web publications - we give
their URLs as hotlinks, listed within the book or article
section of the bibliography as appropriate; in other words, we put our money where
our mouth is; at the same time, the quality of any links offered by
contributors should be checked, since bad links (bad for whatever reason) might
redound adversely on the project;
- variety of experts: commission some texts by experts (preferably by some of those whose names appear
in the bibliography), to underline the serious nature of the web as a medium for
the communication of ideas;
- photographs and transcriptions of documents: select appropriate documents
from the NMM's collections, and always reproduce them
as images together with an adjacent transcription and commentary on their importance:
students may then learn to decipher handwriting from earlier centuries, and gain
experience practising;
- ships as documents: select appropriate paintings of ships in battle, and use them also as
documents, perhaps in association with diagrams of the battle, and log-book and
press reports of it; doing so will help reinforce the notion of artworks as
documents;