Britain and the Sea:

Desirable Scholarly Features

Given the requirement that the material be used for learning, we should try to distinguish the project from the usual lightweight, flashy web offerings, not by imitating any book format, but by including essential features for scholarly communication, such as:

  1. commented bibliography to stiffen the academic basis of the project, and to underline the point that the web is just a medium; that much important work is still published on paper and will continue to be so; but that there is no reason why a web-based presentation shouldn't parallel a book in seriousness and excede it in flexibility;
  2. web publications in the bibliography with books/articles, but as a separate section: the point above may be underlined by making sure that as many bibliographical items as possible are web publications - we give their URLs as hotlinks, listed within the book or article section of the bibliography as appropriate; in other words, we put our money where our mouth is; at the same time, the quality of any links offered by contributors should be checked, since bad links (bad for whatever reason) might redound adversely on the project;
  3. variety of experts: commission some texts by experts (preferably by some of those whose names appear in the bibliography), to underline the serious nature of the web as a medium for the communication of ideas;
  4. photographs and transcriptions of documents: select appropriate documents from the NMM's collections, and always reproduce them as images together with an adjacent transcription and commentary on their importance: students may then learn to decipher handwriting from earlier centuries, and gain experience practising;
  5. ships as documents: select appropriate paintings of ships in battle, and use them also as documents, perhaps in association with diagrams of the battle, and log-book and press reports of it; doing so will help reinforce the notion of artworks as documents;